<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Coruscation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.stylizedfacts.com,2010:/coruscation/4</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/fotohof/managed-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4" title="Coruscation" />
    <updated>2010-03-07T18:44:16Z</updated>
    <subtitle>by Stylized Facts.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
 

<entry>
    <title>Sonyma will help if income under $146,420, home less than $637,640.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/2010/03/in_sharp_contrast_to_all.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/fotohof/managed-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=8010" title="Sonyma will help if income under $146,420, home less than $637,640." />
    <id>tag:www.stylizedfacts.com,2010:/coruscation//4.8010</id>
    
    <published>2010-03-07T18:40:48Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-07T18:44:16Z</updated>
    
    <summary>In sharp contrast to all the mortgages out there with stiff underwriting guidelines, New York&apos;s Low Interest Rate mortgages have no minimum credit score. Borrowers can also qualify for a Sonyma mortgage if their total monthly debt payments reach 45...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="RE" />
    
        <category term="Westchester" />
    
        <category term="mortgage" />
    
        <category term="ny" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />In sharp contrast to all the mortgages out there with stiff underwriting guidelines, New York's Low Interest Rate mortgages have no minimum credit score. Borrowers can also qualify for a Sonyma mortgage if their total monthly debt payments reach 45 percent of their monthly income -- and sometimes more. That's about 5 percent higher than the amount allowed by conventional lenders, and higher than the threshold recommended by many financial counselors.</p>

<p>Still, Mr. Leocata maintains that borrowers default on these loans less frequently than those with conventional mortgages. Borrowers must pay monthly mortgage insurance premiums. For a 3 percent down payment, the monthly premium is 0.8 percent of the loan amount; for 5 percent, it's 0.67 percent; and for 10 percent, 0.42 percent.</p>

<p>Borrowers must also fall within the household income limits -- $107,520 in Manhattan, $142,520 in Long Island and $146,420 in Westchester -- and the purchase price cannot exceed $637,640.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>George Leocata, a senior vice president at Sonyma, says demand for the Low Interest Rate Program has been the highest in 12 years, which is hardly surprising given the difficulty in qualifying for conventional loans in recent months.</p>

<p>Thanks to an infusion of federal support late last year through the economic stimulus package, the State of New York Mortgage Agency, or Sonyma, is now offering 30-year affordable-housing loans at 4.75 percent, down from an average rate of 5.25 to 5.75 percent last year and well below the 5 percent or so being offered by mainstream lenders to their best customers.</p>

<p>REAL ESTATE<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/07/realestate/07Mort.html">Help for First-Time Buyers</a><br />
By BOB TEDESCHI<br />
Published: March 3, 2010<br />
The State of New York Mortgage Agency, or Sonyma, is offering 30-year affordable-housing loans at 4.75 percent.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>He said, she said reporting due to &apos;Regression to a phony mean&apos; </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/2010/02/regression_to_a_phony_mean_tha.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/fotohof/managed-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=8003" title="He said, she said reporting due to 'Regression to a phony mean' " />
    <id>tag:www.stylizedfacts.com,2010:/coruscation//4.8003</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-22T16:31:22Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-27T16:40:24Z</updated>
    
    <summary>This is a post about a single line in a recent article in the New York Times: Tea Party Lights Fuse for Rebellion on Right.... Reporter David Barstow spent five months--five months!--reporting and researching the Tea Party phenomenon. Based not...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="language" />
    
        <category term="media_MSM" />
    
        <category term="media_better" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is a post about a single line in a recent article in the New York Times: Tea Party Lights Fuse for Rebellion on Right.... Reporter David Barstow spent five months--five months!--reporting and researching the Tea Party phenomenon.<br />
Based not on a subjective assessment of the Tea Party's viability or his opinion of its desirability but only on facts he knows about the state of politics and government since Obama's election, is there any substantial likelihood of a tyranny replacing the American republic in the near future?</p>

<p>I think it's obvious....that the answers are "no." For if the answers were "yes" it would have been a huge story! No fair description of the current situation, nothing in what the Washington bureau and investigative staff of the New York Times has picked up from its reporting, would support a characterization like "impending tyranny."</p>

<p>In a word, the Times editors and Barstow know this narrative is nuts, but something stops them from saying so-- despite the fact that they must have spent over $100,000 on this one story. And whatever that thing is, it's not the reluctance to voice an opinion in the news columns, but a reluctance to report a fact in the news columns, the fact that the "narrative of impending tyranny" is ungrounded in any observable reality, even though the sense of grievance within the Tea Party movement is truly felt and politically consequential.</p>

<p>My claim: We have come upon something interfering with political journalism's "sense of reality" as the philosopher Isaiah Berlin called it (see section 5.1) And I think I have a term for the confusing factor: a quest for innocence in reportage and dispute description. <strong>Innocence, meaning a determination not to be implicated, enlisted, or seen by the public as involved. That's what created the pattern I've called "regression to a phony mean." That's what motivated the rise of he said, she said reporting.</strong><br />
<br /></p>

<p> -- <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2010/02/21/innocence.html">Jay Rosen</a></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p></p>

<p></p>

<p>See also</p>

<p><a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/04/12/hesaid_shesaid.html"> He Said, She Said: False Balance</a></p>

<p><a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2004/01/07/press_religion.html#morel">Journalism is a Religion</a> (2004):<br />
1.) J-School as School of Theology<br />
2.) The Journalist's Creed<br />
3.) The Orthodoxy of No Orthodoxy<br />
4.) Practicing Journalism But Not Understanding It<br />
5.) The First Amendment as Press Religion<br />
6.) The God Term of Journalism is the Public<br />
7.) A Breakaway Church in the Press<br />
8.) Interview at the Axis of Evil</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Long holding homeowners, not flippers, reassure would-be homebuyers</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/2010/02/richard_v_guardino_jr_executiv.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/fotohof/managed-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=7995" title="Long holding homeowners, not flippers, reassure would-be homebuyers" />
    <id>tag:www.stylizedfacts.com,2010:/coruscation//4.7995</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-15T02:47:36Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-15T02:52:24Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Richard V. Guardino Jr., executive director of the Wilbur F. Breslin Center for Real Estate Studies at Hofstra, said that while the critical issue in being able to sell a home was its &quot;current condition,&quot; the &quot;fact that it has...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="RE" />
    
        <category term="ny" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/">
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Richard V. Guardino</strong> Jr., executive director of the<strong> Wilbur F. Breslin Center for Real Estate Studies at Hofstra</strong>, said that while the critical issue in being able to sell a home was its "current condition," the "fact that it has been in one family for a long time is an indication of stability," particularly in the neighborhood.<br /></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>REAL ESTATE<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/14/realestate/14lizo.html">Letting Go of the Homestead</a><br />
By MARCELLE S. FISCHLER<br />
Published: February 10, 2010<br />
Students of the real estate market say that the bond between longtime owners and the houses they are giving up can actually be a tonic for potential buyers.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Shelby, Senate Banking Committee vs Volcker rule</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/2010/02/_shelby_the_ranking_republican.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/fotohof/managed-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=7994" title="Shelby, Senate Banking Committee vs Volcker rule" />
    <id>tag:www.stylizedfacts.com,2010:/coruscation//4.7994</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-15T01:17:59Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-15T01:30:14Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Shelby, the ranking Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, has already signaled that he&apos;ll fight the Obama administration&apos;s push for a &quot;Volcker rule&quot; to rein in too-big-to-fail financial behemoths. The conservative message guru Frank Luntz has drafted a memo instructing...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="finance" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Shelby, the ranking Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, has already signaled that he'll fight the Obama administration's push for a "Volcker rule" to rein in too-big-to-fail financial behemoths. The conservative message guru Frank Luntz has <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/01/frank-luntz-pens-memo-to_n_444332.html">drafted</a> a memo instructing G.O.P. legislators on how to defeat a new Consumer Financial Protection Agency while camouflaging themselves as populist foes of the very banks and credit card companies that that agency would regulate. That's a neat trick -- Luntz's nonpolitical clients include Merrill Lynch and American Express -- and it helps explain why Wall Street is now tilting its contributions to Congressional Republicans for 2010.<br></p>

<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top:10px;height:15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/491a5982-1e93-4a7a-95f8-14ac46f0bb21/" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=491a5982-1e93-4a7a-95f8-14ac46f0bb21" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" style="border:none;float:right"></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script type="text/javascript" src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" defer="defer"></script></span></div>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>OP-ED COLUMNIST<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/14/opinion/14rich.html">Palin's Cunning Sleight of Hand</a><br />
By FRANK RICH<br />
Published: February 14, 2010<br />
Republicans are getting away with their populist masquerade, and Democrats are not convincing the country that they offer anything better.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>You should save to the point of discomfort and maybe beyond</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/2010/02/hiring_a_full-time_adviser_is.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/fotohof/managed-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=7996" title="You should save to the point of discomfort and maybe beyond" />
    <id>tag:www.stylizedfacts.com,2010:/coruscation//4.7996</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-12T07:05:20Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-15T07:07:22Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Hiring a full-time adviser is not unlike hiring a physical trainer -- someone who can teach you the proper diet and routine, and push you a little further than you may be willing to go on your own. &quot;You should...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Investing" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hiring a full-time adviser is not unlike hiring a physical trainer -- someone who can teach you the proper diet and routine, and push you a little further than you may be willing to go on your own. "You should save to the point of discomfort and maybe beyond, and that is not something people will do unprompted," said Jim McCarthy, head of client advisory and retirement services at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney.</p>

<p>One reason some people are willing to pay a full-time planner is that they know they can call at any time without being on the clock. Mr. Richards, who runs the Behavior Gap site, said his clients had told him they called him first when they had a question or a calamity because they knew he wasn't "starting a stop watch."</p>

<p>"You don't fix emotional problems with logic, you fix them with trust," he said. "And that is really difficult to do, to build that over the phone if you aren't having an ongoing relationship."<br></p>

<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top:10px;height:15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/19e4b655-5c49-4062-80ff-0af88c92fca2/" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=19e4b655-5c49-4062-80ff-0af88c92fca2" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" style="border:none;float:right"></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script type="text/javascript" src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" defer="defer"></script></span></div>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>YOUR MONEY<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/16/your-money/financial-planners/16money.html">For Financial Advice, Arriving at the Right Dosage</a><br />
By TARA SIEGEL BERNARD<br />
Published: January 16, 2010<br />
People who need a little assistance have a number of inexpensive options. For those who want more guidance, the equivalent of a physical trainer is also available.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Letting your house go to foreclosure because you are out of money and purposefully defaulting on a mortgage to save money: murky</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/2010/02/the_difference_between_letting.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/fotohof/managed-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=7962" title="Letting your house go to foreclosure because you are out of money and purposefully defaulting on a mortgage to save money: murky" />
    <id>tag:www.stylizedfacts.com,2010:/coruscation//4.7962</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-03T06:27:17Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-03T06:36:13Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The difference between letting your house go to foreclosure because you are out of money and purposefully defaulting on a mortgage to save money can be murky. But a growing body of research indicates that significant numbers of borrowers are...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="mortgage" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />The difference between letting your house go to foreclosure because you are out of money and purposefully defaulting on a <a href="http://stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/mortgage/">mortgage</a> to save money can be murky. But a growing body of research indicates that significant numbers of borrowers are declining to live under what some waggishly call "house arrest."</p>

<p>Using credit bureau data, consultants at Oliver Wyman calculated how many borrowers went straight from being current on their mortgage to default, rather than making spotty payments. They also weeded out owners having trouble paying other bills. Their estimate was that about 17 percent of owners defaulting in 2008, or 588,000 people, chose that option as a strategic calculation.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>BUSINESS</p>

<p>In 2006, Benjamin Koellmann bought a condominium in Miami Beach. By his calculation, it will be about the year 2025 before he can sell his modest home for what he paid. Or maybe 2040.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/03/business/03walk.html">No Help in Sight, More Homeowners Walk Away</a><br />
By DAVID STREITFELD<br />
Published: February 3, 2010<br />
By June, about 5.1 million people will own a home whose value is below 75 percent of what is owed.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>It&apos;s not insurance if you&apos;re the only customer</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/2010/02/insurance_regulators_said_dela.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/fotohof/managed-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=7958" title="It's not insurance if you're the only customer" />
    <id>tag:www.stylizedfacts.com,2010:/coruscation//4.7958</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-02T06:35:33Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-01T06:40:35Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Insurance regulators said Delaware did not consider credit-default swaps to be insurance. &quot;I don&apos;t think an insurance commissioner should tread on the toes of the banking industry,&quot; said Karen Weldin Stewart, the commissioner in Delaware. &quot;This started out as a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Structured_Finance" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Insurance regulators said Delaware did not consider credit-default swaps to be insurance. </p>

<p>"I don't think an insurance commissioner should tread on the toes of the banking industry," said Karen Weldin Stewart, the commissioner in Delaware. "This started out as a bank product."</p>

<p>Her special deputy for examinations, John Tinsley, explained the reasoning. "In insurance, you're putting together a pool," he said. Each customer would be charged a premium based on the total risk of the pool. </p>

<p>A credit-default swap cannot be insurance, Mr. Tinsley said, because it does not involve a pool. There is just one seller and one buyer for every contract. </p>

<p>"It's an investment product," he said. "It's closer to buying an option." </p>

<p>Not everyone agrees. Eric R. Dinallo, New York State's insurance superintendent when A.I.G. imploded, said he believed credit-default swaps were insurance and should be regulated as such. <br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Business<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/01/business/01swaps.html">Risky Trading Wasn't Just on the Fringe at A.I.G.</a><br />
By MARY WILLIAMS WALSH<br />
Published: February 1, 2010<br />
The conventional wisdom was that risky derivatives from a London unit brought down A.I.G. But a Delaware division was gambling as well.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The original Title VII, in 1964, prohibited &quot;disparate treatment&quot; on the basis of race. In 1991, Congress amended the law to prohibit employment policies that have a &quot;disparate impact&quot; as well.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/2010/02/a_target_that_does_bear.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/fotohof/managed-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=7957" title="The original Title VII, in 1964, prohibited &quot;disparate treatment&quot; on the basis of race. In 1991, Congress amended the law to prohibit employment policies that have a &quot;disparate impact&quot; as well." />
    <id>tag:www.stylizedfacts.com,2010:/coruscation//4.7957</id>
    
    <published>2010-02-01T06:23:40Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-01T06:28:24Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A target that does bear watching is the heavily freighted civil rights issue that the court raised and then skirted last June in the New Haven firefighters case, Ricci v. DeStefano. The issue in that case was whether the city...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="fair" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A target that does bear watching is the heavily freighted civil rights issue that the court raised and then skirted last June in the New Haven firefighters case, Ricci v. DeStefano. The issue in that case was whether the city engaged in a prohibited act of employment discrimination when it discarded the results of a promotion exam on which no black test-taker scored high enough to win a promotion. White firefighters who believed they were entitled to promotion sued under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race.</p>

<p>The original Title VII, in 1964, prohibited "disparate treatment" on the basis of race. In 1991, Congress amended the law to prohibit employment policies that have a "disparate impact" as well. The question for the Supreme Court last June was whether, in trying to avoid the racially disparate impact of the exam, New Haven had made the successful white firefighters the victims of disparate treatment. </p>

<p>The court ruled against the city; Justice Kennedy wrote for the 5-to-4 majority that New Haven's concern about liability for the racially disparate impact of the exam was overblown and insufficient to justify withholding promotions from the successful white test-takers. </p>

<p>The decision avoided a tricky question: suppose the racially disparate impact of a municipal employment policy is so grave that the Civil Rights Act requires a remedy that itself takes race into account - in other words, a remedy for disparate impact that requires disparate treatment. </p>

<p>The court's current majority has made clear that for the government to count individuals by race for almost any purpose is a violation of constitutional magnitude. So how could a statute that could require such an outcome be constitutional? In the New Haven case, Justice Kennedy left it to Justice Scalia to observe sarcastically in a concurring opinion that the court's resolution of the firefighter dispute "merely postpones the evil day on which the court will have to confront the question" of the Civil Rights Act's constitutionality. </p>

<p>Finding the law unconstitutional would be an astonishing step, all the more so because the Civil Rights Act's current form is a Congressional response to a series of Supreme Court decisions in the late 1980's that gave the law a reading that Congress thought was too narrow. The 1991 amendment codified a unanimous opinion of the Burger court, which in 1971 interpreted the original Civil Rights Act to bar employment policies that had a racially disparate impact, such as education requirements that were unrelated to the actual job.</p>

<p>  -- <a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/28/the-next-time/">Linda Greenhouse </a><br />
<br /><br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Opinion<br />
<a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/28/the-next-time/">Opinionator: The Next Time</a><br />
By By LINDA GREENHOUSE<br />
Published: January 28, 2010<br />
What will the Chief Justice Roberts majority's next target be next, now that it has experienced the joy of overturning?</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Details like apartment safes</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/2010/01/details_like_apartment_safes.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/fotohof/managed-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=7950" title="Details like apartment safes" />
    <id>tag:www.stylizedfacts.com,2010:/coruscation//4.7950</id>
    
    <published>2010-01-31T21:17:12Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-31T21:30:08Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Apart from that, there are details like apartment safes, which could matter to clubgoers who party in their own cribs. &quot;You may trust your friends and roommates, but you don&apos;t have to,&quot; said Jeffrey E. Levine, the chairman of Douglaston...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="RE" />
    
        <category term="ny" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Apart from that, there are details like apartment safes, which could matter to clubgoers who party in their own cribs. </p>

<p>"You may trust your friends and roommates, but you don't have to," said Jeffrey E. Levine, the chairman of Douglaston Development and its construction arm, Levine Builders. "And every medicine cabinet has a keyed lockbox for pharmaceuticals. Viagra, Vioxx, Vicodin -- nobody needs to know but you." </p>

<p>The smallest studio is just under 400 square feet and it's $1,850 a month and one month free rent. The smallest two-bedroom apartment is just under 900 square feet and it's $3,590 and one month free. <br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Douglaston Development recently began leasing apartments at Ohm, a 288-unit tower at 312 11th Avenue and 30th Street, just north of the heart of West Chelsea's nightlife. In a marketing approach called "untested" by other property marketers, Douglaston is using the area's nightclubs as inspiration for building amenities. </p>

<p>Real Estate<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/31/realestate/31posting.html">A Nightclub to Call Home</a><br />
By ALISON GREGOR<br />
Published: January 28, 2010<br />
Douglaston Development is marking Ohm, a 288-unit tower at 312 11th Avenue and 30th Street, using the neighborhood's nightclubs.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Bubbles as mania</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/2010/01/bubbles_as_mania.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/fotohof/managed-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=7946" title="Bubbles as mania" />
    <id>tag:www.stylizedfacts.com,2010:/coruscation//4.7946</id>
    
    <published>2010-01-28T19:35:02Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-31T19:37:59Z</updated>
    
    <summary>a bubble is a form of psychological malfunction. And like mental illness there&apos;s a tricky gray area between being really sick and just having a few problems, Mr. Shiller said during a panel discussion at the World Economic Forum in...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="econ" />
    
        <category term="finance" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />a bubble is a form of psychological malfunction. And like mental illness there's a tricky gray area between being really sick and just having a few problems, Mr. Shiller said during a panel discussion at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.</p>

<p>The solution: a checklist like psychologists use to determine if someone is suffering from, say, depression. So here is Mr. Shiller's checklist.</p>

<ul>
	<li>Sharp increases in the price of an asset like real estate or dot-com shares </li>
	<li>Great public excitement about said increases </li>
	<li>An accompanying media frenzy </li>
	<li>Stories of people earning a lot of money, causing envy among people who aren't </li>
	<li>Growing interest in the asset class among the general public </li>
	<li>"New era" theories to justify unprecedented price increases </li>
	<li>A decline in lending standards </li>
</ul>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Business<br />
DealBook: Shiller's List: <a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/schillers-list-how-to-diagnose-the-next-bubble/">How to Diagnose the Next Bubble</a><br />
By By JACK EWING<br />
Published: January 27, 2010<br />
Robert J. Shiller, the Nobel-prize winning Yale economist, suggested Wednesday -- a bit whimsically -- that bubbles could be diagnosed using the same methodology psychologists use to diagnose mental illness.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Exercise: In Women, Training for a Sharper Mind</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/2010/01/january_26_2010_vital_signs.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/fotohof/managed-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=7945" title="Exercise: In Women, Training for a Sharper Mind" />
    <id>tag:www.stylizedfacts.com,2010:/coruscation//4.7945</id>
    
    <published>2010-01-24T19:07:51Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-31T19:17:52Z</updated>
    
    <summary>January 26, 2010 Vital Signs of Health: Exercise: In Women, Training for a Sharper Mind By Older women who did an hour or two of strength training exercises each week had improved cognitive function a year later, scoring higher on...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Health" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />January 26, 2010<br />
Vital Signs of <a href="http://stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/health/">Health</a>:<br />
Exercise: In Women, Training for a Sharper Mind <br />
By <br />
Older women who did an hour or two of strength training exercises each week had improved cognitive function a year later, scoring higher on tests of the brain processes responsible for planning and executing tasks, a new study has found.</p>

<p>Researchers in British Columbia <strong>randomly assigned 155 women ages 65 to 75 either to strength training with dumbbells and weight machines once or twice a week, or to a comparison group doing balance and toning exercises</strong>. </p>

<p>A year later, the women who did strength training had <strong>improved their performance on tests of so-called executive function by 10.9 percent to 12.6 percent, while those assigned to balance and toning exercises experienced a slight deterioration -- 0.5 percent. The improvements in the strength training group included an enhanced ability to make decisions, resolve conflicts and focus on subjects without being distracted by competing stimuli.</strong><br />
Older women are generally less likely than others to do strength training, even though it can promote bone health and counteract muscle loss, said Teresa Liu-Ambrose, a researcher at the Center for Hip Health and Mobility at Vancouver General Hospital and the lead author of the paper, which appears in the Jan. 25 issue of <a href="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/">Archives of Internal Medicine</a>.</p>

<p>  --  RONI CARYN RABIN<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Vital Signs<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/26/health/research/26exer.html">Exercise: In Women, Training for a Sharper Mind</a><br />
By RONI CARYN RABIN<br />
Published: January 26, 2010<br />
Older women who did an hour or two of strength training exercises each week had improved cognitive function a year later, a study found.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>To prevent fraud EU pays by planted rather than the tons produced. </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/2010/01/to_prevent_fraud_eu_pays_by_pl.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/fotohof/managed-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=7890" title="To prevent fraud EU pays by planted rather than the tons produced. " />
    <id>tag:www.stylizedfacts.com,2010:/coruscation//4.7890</id>
    
    <published>2010-01-13T06:37:55Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-13T06:43:43Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Calabria, like other southern Italian regions rich in agriculture, has long benefited from hefty European Union agricultural subsidies. To prevent fraud in which small acreage yielded puzzlingly large harvests, in 2007 the European Union changed its rules to base subsidies...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="econ" />
    
        <category term="law" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Calabria, like other southern Italian regions rich in agriculture, has long benefited from hefty European Union agricultural subsidies. To prevent fraud in which small acreage yielded puzzlingly large harvests, in 2007 the European Union changed its rules to base subsidies on the number of hectares planted rather than the tons produced. </p>

<p>The result, some authorities hypothesize, is that it may be more lucrative for some Calabrian landowners to let their harvests rot on the tree and collect the subsidies than to pay pickers. In theory, the migrants may have become less useful and, possibly, less tolerated. </p>

<p><br /><br />
<blockquote>Still, the violence was dramatic. After immigrants struck residents and shops with sticks and burned and smashed cars, residents began responding with violence. By late Saturday night, most immigrants feared for their safety and voluntarily boarded buses and trains that took them to immigrant detention centers elsewhere in southern Italy, Rosarno authorities said. </blockquote></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>International / Europe<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/13/world/europe/13italy.html">Looking Past the Facade of Italian City After Riots</a><br />
By RACHEL DONADIO<br />
Published: January 13, 2010<br />
In Rosarno, where the worst immigrant rioting ever seen in Italy took place over the weekend, the economy is so weak that locals and immigrants are competitors.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Unions oppose Obamacare tax on good health insurance</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/2010/01/unions_oppose_obamacare_tax_on.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/fotohof/managed-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=7838" title="Unions oppose Obamacare tax on good health insurance" />
    <id>tag:www.stylizedfacts.com,2010:/coruscation//4.7838</id>
    
    <published>2010-01-08T19:37:09Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-09T19:45:41Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Labor leaders are fuming that President Obama has endorsed a tax on high-priced, employer-sponsored health insurance policies as a way to help cover the cost of health care reform. And as Senate and House leaders seek to negotiate a final...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Health" />
    
        <category term="econ" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Labor leaders are fuming that President Obama has endorsed a tax on high-priced, employer-sponsored health insurance policies as a way to help cover the cost of health care reform. And as Senate and House leaders seek to negotiate a final health care bill, unions are pushing mightily to have that tax dropped from the legislation. Or at the very least, they want the price threshold raised so that the tax would affect fewer workers. </p>

<p>Labor leaders say the tax would hit not only wealthy executives with expensive health benefits, but also many rank-and-file union members who have often settled for lower wage increases in exchange for more generous health benefits. </p>

<p>The tax would affect individual insurance policies with annual premiums above $8,500 and family policies above $23,000, which by one union survey would affect one in four union members. <br />
<br /><br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>In recent days, labor's strategy has become clear. Unions are urging their members to flood their representatives with e-mail messages and phone calls in the hope that the House will stand fast and reject the tax. The A.F.L.-C.I.O., a federation of nine million union members, has declared next Wednesday "National Call-In Day" asking workers to call their lawmakers to urge them not to tax health benefits. The International Brotherhood of Teamsters is urging members to tell their representatives that "such a tax is simply a massive middle-class tax hike that this nation's working families should not be forced to endure."</p>

<p>Many Democrats fear that enacting the tax will hurt their re-election chances.</p>

<p>"This would really have a negative impact on the Democratic base," said Representative Joe Courtney, Democrat of Connecticut, who has enlisted 190 House Democrats to sign a letter opposing the tax. "As far as the message goes, it's a real toughie to defend."</p>

<p>While union leaders would prefer killing the tax, some say privately that they could live with it if the threshold is lifted to $27,000, say, or $30,000. They argue that many insurance policies above $23,000 are typical of the coverage in high-cost areas like New York or Boston, or policies that cover small businesses or employers with older workers.</p>

<p>According to a union survey, one in four members would be hit by a $23,000 threshold, but only one in 14 if the threshold were raised to $27,000. </p>

<p>White House officials, however, voice concern that raising the threshold that much would lose $50 billion of the $149 billion in revenue that the tax is expected to generate over 10 years.</p>

<p></p>

<hr>

<p>Business<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/09/business/09union.html">Unions Rally to Oppose a Tax on Health Insurance</a><br />
By STEVEN GREENHOUSE<br />
Published: January 9, 2010<br />
Labor leaders say President Obama is betraying unions by supporting a tax on high-priced, employer-sponsored health insurance.<br /><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Healthcare individual mandate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/2010/01/take_the_individual_mandate_bi.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/fotohof/managed-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=7839" title="Healthcare individual mandate" />
    <id>tag:www.stylizedfacts.com,2010:/coruscation//4.7839</id>
    
    <published>2010-01-07T19:56:26Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-09T20:00:33Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Take the &quot;individual mandate&quot; bit: The rule that everybody must buy insurance or get fined. That&apos;s something both conservatives and liberals hate, though its inclusion may have been the price to pay to get the insurance industry to agree to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Health" />
    
        <category term="econ" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Take the "individual mandate" bit: The rule that everybody must buy insurance or get fined. That's something both conservatives and liberals hate, though its inclusion may have been the price to pay to get the insurance industry to agree to any reform. </p>

<p>Now, the individual mandate made excellent sense at the beginning of this re-sewing process, because if people were allowed not to buy insurance at all then the low-risk young people would do exactly that. This would have had two bad consequences: First, they would still need charity care if they got sick or hurt in an accident. Second, the average price of insurance would be higher because the lower-risk people would not be contributing towards it.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Though this sounds backwards,</p>

<blockquote>Ending with a compromise is like ending with a shirt which has humongous breast bags and too tight a waist. And that's why I'm not very happy with what we have so far.</blockquote> 

<p><br />
-- <a href="http://echidneofthesnakes.blogspot.com/2010_01_01_archive.html#602023865371835802">echidneofthesnakes</a><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Theorists and practitioners of intelligence </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/2010/01/then_as_now_theorists_and.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/fotohof/managed-mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=7831" title="Theorists and practitioners of intelligence " />
    <id>tag:www.stylizedfacts.com,2010:/coruscation//4.7831</id>
    
    <published>2010-01-07T02:42:51Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-04T09:08:28Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Then, as now, theorists and practitioners of intelligence sought a smoothly functioning, highly efficient and seamlessly integrated organization, or cluster of organizations. But they struggled at it, largely because the purposes to which intelligence were put were complex and at...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="books" />
    
        <category term="econometrics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Then, as now, theorists and practitioners of intelligence sought a smoothly functioning, highly efficient and seamlessly integrated organization, or cluster of organizations. But they struggled at it, largely because the purposes to which intelligence were put were complex and at times contradictory. </p>

<p>In his book "Cloak and Gown," published in 1987, the Yale historian Robin Winks pointed out, "The 'intelligence debate' was framed in 1949." That was the year a classic text, Sherman Kent's "Strategic Intelligence for American World Policy," came out. </p>

<p>To Kent, the best intelligence-gathering was the work "of devoted specialists molded into a vigorous production unit," who prized the arts of data accumulation and nonideological analysis. </p>

<p>Kent's book was widely adopted by intelligence services around the world. But it also had critics, among them the political scientist Willmoore Kendall, a onetime adviser to the C.I.A. He wrote that Kent's approach, influenced by the Pearl Harbor attack, betrayed "a compulsive preoccupation with prediction, with the elimination of 'surprise' from foreign affairs." </p>

<p>This was a worthy goal in wartime, Mr. Kendall said, but in peacetime the most useful intelligence provided the big "pictures" of the world that decision makers needed for formulating broad policy. Intelligence <strong>experts therefore should not just acquire and analyze information; they should interpret it</strong> as well. </p>

<p><br />
<br /><br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Week in Review<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/weekinreview/03tanenhaus.html">The DNA Problem in American Spying</a><br />
By SAM TANENHAUS<br />
Published: January 1, 2010<br />
The why-can't-we-all-get-along issues have haunted American intelligence for six decades.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

