<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Stylized Facts</title>
      <link>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/</link>
      <description>Frequent sideblog: Coruscation.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.32-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Following through on the metaphor</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><br />Raising social issues, the movement's leaders say, risks fracturing the strength it has built. "Every social issue you bring in, you're adding <strong>planks </strong>to your mission," said Frank Anderson, a founder of the Independence Caucus, based in Utah. "And <strong>planks </strong>become <strong>splinters</strong>."</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2010/03/following_through_on_the_metap.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2010/03/following_through_on_the_metap.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>the dark, half- crippled, doughnut-gobbling man-apes of the literary world</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>So let's read Lipsyte and rejoice;<a href="So let's read Lipsyte and rejoice; let's celebrate the laugh-producing Milo Burkes who are all too rarely brought to us by brave and bitter men -- let's celebrate the canny, well-educated yet perpetually failing furtive Internet onanists, the dark, half- crippled, doughnut-gobbling man-apes of the literary world, who cast their lumpen shadows across the rest of us. These are the kind of unlikable, lovable protagonists we miss; these are the self-loathing, mediocre secret geniuses who can set our people free. Lydia Millet's"> let's celebrate</a> the laugh-producing Milo Burkes who are all too rarely brought to us by brave and bitter men -- let's celebrate the canny, well-educated yet perpetually failing furtive Internet onanists, the dark, half- crippled, doughnut-gobbling man-apes of the literary world, who cast their lumpen shadows across the rest of us.</p>

<p>These are the kind of unlikable, lovable protagonists we miss; these are the self-loathing, mediocre secret geniuses who can set our people free.</p>

<p><br />
Lydia Millet's </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2010/03/so_lets_read_lipsyte_and.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2010/03/so_lets_read_lipsyte_and.html</guid>
         <category>Quote</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Enquiring Press needed -- Douthat</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>It's remarkable, in a way, that the Enquirer still exists at all, let alone that it's enjoying a moment in the journalistic sun. In the age of Gawker, Twitter, and TMZ.com, a weekly scandal sheet seems quaint, if not archaic. And in an era when newspapers are fighting desperately for readers, you would think that the mainstream media -- hemorrhaging subscribers and hungry for online eyeballs -- would uncover all the really interesting scandals first.</p>

<p>But you'd be wrong. The Internet is very good at generating gossip, but lousy at the dogged work of transforming rumor into news. And the national press almost seems more uncertain about when and whether to probe into politicians' private lives<br /></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2010/03/enquiring_press_needed_--_dout.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2010/03/enquiring_press_needed_--_dout.html</guid>
         <category>Culture</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Susceptibility to rhetorical manipulation</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Anybody who says you can't have it both ways clearly hasn't been spending much time reading opinion polls lately. One year ago, 59 percent of the American public liked the stimulus plan, according to Gallup. A few months later, with the economy still deeply mired in recession, a majority of the same size said Obama was spending too much money on it. There's nothing wrong with changing your mind, of course, but opinion polls over the last year reflect something altogether more troubling: a country that simultaneously demands and rejects action on unemployment, deficits, health care, climate change, and a whole host of other major problems. Sixty percent of Americans want stricter regulations of financial institutions. But nearly the same proportion says we're suffering from too much regulation on business. That kind of illogic--or, if you prefer, <strong>susceptibility to rhetorical manipulation</strong>--is what locks the status quo in place.</p>

<p>  --  <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2243797/">Jacob Weisberg</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2010/02/susceptibility_to_rhetorical_m.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2010/02/susceptibility_to_rhetorical_m.html</guid>
         <category>Language</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>An efficient, competitive private mortgage market, an area in which commercial bank participation is needed. Those are matters for another day.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In this country, I believe regulation of large insurance companies operating over many states needs to be reviewed. We also face a large challenge in rebuilding an efficient, competitive private mortgage market, an area in which commercial bank participation is needed. Those are matters for another day.</p>

<p> -- Paul Volcker, a former chairman of the Federal Reserve, chairman of the president's Economic Recovery Advisory Board. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2010/01/in_this_country_i_believe.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2010/01/in_this_country_i_believe.html</guid>
         <category>Politics</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Is it morally right to make ugly buildings look beautiful?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Very nice photos.  But, I'm <a href="http://www.restlus.com/2010/01/morality-building-beauty-shots.html">wondering</a>: is it morally right to make ugly buildings look beautiful ? <br /></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2010/01/is_it_morally_right_to_make_ug.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2010/01/is_it_morally_right_to_make_ug.html</guid>
         <category>Ideas</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Class Warfare a Threat to US Recovery -- Art Cashin</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>If Only We Could Just Get Back To Work </p>

<p>"Jobless claims were actually even better than some down here [on Wall Street] thought," cashin said. But he cautioned that political conflict such as the ongoing health-care debate is constituting a form of class warfare -- which could hinder America's return to <a href="http://www.stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/econ/">economic</a> health.</p>

<p>"It's bubbling up again, all this 'Wall Street versis Main Street' stuff...<strong>If we could get back to work again instead of pointing fingers, things in this country would go a lot better</strong>."<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2009/12/class_warfare_a_threat_to_us_r.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2009/12/class_warfare_a_threat_to_us_r.html</guid>
         <category>Language</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Just friends: Privacy in closed social network ?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><br />Privacy law was largely created in the pre-Internet age, and new rules are needed to keep up with the ways people communicate today. Much of what occurs online, like blog posting, is intended to be an open declaration to the world, and law enforcement is within its rights to read and act on what is written. Other kinds of communication, particularly in a closed network, may come with an expectation of privacy. If government agents are joining social networks under false pretenses to spy without a court order, for example, that might be crossing a line.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2009/12/just_friends_privacy_in_closed.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2009/12/just_friends_privacy_in_closed.html</guid>
         <category>Law</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Punctuating Orthography</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>For some strange Reason, certain People think that academic Prose must follow the Rechtschreibreform.  Such is the Case no matter how many Times i say: "Students, Your Essays should adhere to the Rules of american Orthography."  What their Problem is, i offer not even a <a href="http://acephalous.typepad.com/acephalous/2009/02/thesis-writing-formal-essays-turns-certain-people-into-germans.html">Guess</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2009/11/punctuating_orthography.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2009/11/punctuating_orthography.html</guid>
         <category>Language</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Trafficking, not trade</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In every part of the world, countless individuals are callously exploited for profit,'' Pillay said. ''While trafficking may be a problem related to migration and to transnational crime, it is also -- and fundamentally -- an attack on the dignity and integrity of the individual. Trafficking involves practices prohibited in every country including slavery, debt, bondage, forced labor and sexual exploitation.''</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2009/11/trafficking_not_trade.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2009/11/trafficking_not_trade.html</guid>
         <category>Law</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Batting Cage vs Hockey</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><object width="445" height="364"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PLFG8a2u44g&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PLFG8a2u44g&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364"></embed></object></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2009/10/batting_cage_vs_hockey.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2009/10/batting_cage_vs_hockey.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 06:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Folly of prizes</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Folly of prizes: If an achievement is meritorious enough to justify a prize, it doesn't need one. If too obscure to be recognized, it has no chance of receiving a prize.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2009/10/folly_of_prizes.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2009/10/folly_of_prizes.html</guid>
         <category>Quote</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 07:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Republican fail ?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Bruce Bartlett, a veteran of the Reagan and H.W. Bush administrations. Bruce made a point that really resonated, and he was gracious enough  to republish it. </p>

<blockquote>I believe that political parties should do penance <strong>for their mistakes and just losing power is not enough</strong>. Part of that involves understanding why those mistakes were made and how to prevent them from happening again. Republicans, however, have done no penance. They just pretend that they did nothing wrong. But until they do penance they don't deserve any credibility and should be ignored until they do. That's what my attacks on Bush are all about. I want Republicans to admit they were wrong about him, accept blame for his mistakes, and take some meaningful action to keep them from happening again. Bush should be treated as a pariah, as Richard Nixon was for many years until he rebuilt his credibility by more or less coming clean about Watergate with David Frost and writing a number of thoughtful books.

<p>One reason this isn't happening is because <strong>the media don't treat Republicans as if they are discredited</strong>. On the contrary, they often seem to be treated as if they have more credibility than the administration. Just look at the silly issue of death panels. The <a href="http://stylizedfacts.com/coruscation/media_msm/">media</a> should have laughed it out the window, ridiculed it or at least ignored it once it was determined that there was no basis to the charge. Instead, those making the most outlandish charges are treated with deference and respect, while those that actually have credibility on the subject are treated as equals at best and often with deep skepticism, as if they are the ones with an ax to grind.</p>

<p>I am <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_08/019503.php">truly baffled</a> by this situation, as I'm sure you are.<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>What if losing power was their mistake ?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2009/09/republican_fail.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2009/09/republican_fail.html</guid>
         <category>Politics</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Smarter America</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Driving the overhaul of the campus tour is colleges' desire to provide visitors a more natural, spontaneous and, ideally, more engaging experience -- and to relieve mothers, in particular, of the nagging worry that their guide might, at any moment, fall backward over a bicycle rack.</p>

<p>The changes have been fortunate for Katie Rice, 21, a senior at Hendrix and long-time guide here, who does not even know when her school was founded -- "I just tell my groups it was a long time ago," she says -- and who never did get the hang of walking backward.</p>

<p>"Look at these shoes," she said the other day,...</p>

<p><br />
Though some have done so on their own, others have been urged to turn their guides around by a private consulting firm called Target X. It charges colleges thousands of dollars to "audit" their tours and look at other aspects of how they present themselves to visitors, including visitor parking.</p>

<p>What did stick was her guide telling her group about a theme night in the cafeteria that commemorated the fall of the Berlin Wall.</p>

<p>"He told us how, on the east side of the room, the cooks removed all the salt and pepper shakers, took all the tablecloths away and served really bad food," she said. "On the west side, they gave nice German candy and decorated the place really well."</p>

<p>Hendrix has emerged as enough of a pace-setter for the modern campus tour that administrators from as far away as Bennington College in Vermont have traveled to Arkansas to see the program.</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2009/08/smarter_america.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2009/08/smarter_america.html</guid>
         <category>Culture</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Yü Gung</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><object width="445" height="364"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/ouOAAHmx88c&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/ouOAAHmx88c&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364"></embed></object></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2009/08/yu_gung.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.stylizedfacts.com/2009/08/yu_gung.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 04:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
